The physically active group rates its health highest and reports the lowest blood-panel uptake
- survey
- 9,097 responses, 7,861 named a work style
Key takeaways
- Asked to describe their workday, 55.1% said they sit at a desk for at least six hours. A further 32.5% said their work includes desk time and movement; 12.5% described their work as physically active, such as field, delivery or hospitality work.
- The physically active group rates its own health highest of the three. 74.7% of its 979 answers put physical health at 4 or 5 out of 5, against 59.0% of 4,327 desk-based answers.
- The physically active group reports the lowest blood-panel uptake of the three. 16.9% of its 838 answers report a full-body blood panel in the last year, against 24.9% desk-based and 25.9% mixed.
- Desk-based and physically active responses report nearly the same share with no day reaching 30 minutes of exercise: 33.4% and 33.3%. The mixed group is lowest of the three at 25.8%.
- Blood-panel uptake is more than three times as high in the highest income band as in the lowest, from 15.6% of answers in the under ₹3 lakh band to 54.3% at ₹40 lakh and above.
The group that describes its working day as physically active gives itself the best health rating of the three and reports the lowest blood-panel uptake. Those answers come from different questions and mean different things. One is how respondents rate their health. The other is whether they report having had a blood panel in the year.
More than half the responses describe a desk-based working day#
The 2026 survey asked one question about how the working day is spent. Of 9,097 responses, 7,861 answered it, choosing one of three descriptions.
Published shares total 100.1% through rounding.
View data table
| Work style, in the survey's own words | Share of answers | Responses |
|---|---|---|
| Sedentary (desk-based, 6+ hrs seated) | 55.1% | 4,328 |
| Mixed (desk + movement, <6 hrs seated) | 32.5% | 2,553 |
| Physically active (e.g., field work, delivery, hospitality) | 12.5% | 980 |
More than half the answers describe a day spent mostly at a desk. The question is single-choice, so each answer picks one of these three and nothing else.
What the answer does not tell you is how much anyone actually moves. It is a description of a job, chosen by the person doing it, with the third option offering three examples: field work, delivery, and hospitality. It records nothing about hours on foot, what gets carried, or what happens once the shift ends. It is a label, not a measurement.
The three groups also differ in who is in them. A quarter of the physically active answers, 25.4% of 979, name an annual income under ₹3 lakh, against 14.3% of 2,552 mixed answers and 9.9% of 4,328 desk-based ones. These are not interchangeable populations sorted only by posture, and income returns on the testing question below.
The physically active group rates its health highest#
Two questions ask respondents to rate their own health, physical and mental, on a five-point scale.
View data table
| Work style | Rate physical health 4–5 out of 5 | Rate mental health 4–5 out of 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Sedentary (desk-based, 6+ hrs seated) | 59.0% (4,327) | 58.4% (4,327) |
| Mixed (desk + movement, <6 hrs seated) | 69.4% (2,553) | 69.8% (2,553) |
| Physically active (e.g., field work, delivery, hospitality) | 74.7% (979) | 76.0% (979) |
Each cell shows the share and the number of responses answering both that rating question and the work-style question.
Three in four of the physically active answers put physical health in the top two ratings on the scale; closer to six in ten of the desk-based answers do. The mental-health column runs the same way, from 58.4% to 76.0%. Whatever else the label describes, the group that chose it is the most confident of the three about how its health is going.
These ratings describe how respondents view their health. They do not show whether someone has an undetected condition.
The physically active group also reports the lowest blood-panel uptake#
A separate question asked what respondents had actually done about their health in the last year. It listed five things: a routine check-up or preventive doctor consult, a doctor visit for a specific symptom, a full-body blood panel covering vitamins, lipids and sugar, a company-organised health camp, and a fitness assessment. It also offered "none of these". 7,048 responses answered it, and 7,047 of those also named a work style.
View data table
| Work style | Had a full-body blood panel | Selected "none of these" |
|---|---|---|
| Sedentary (3,928 answers) | 24.9% | 42.4% |
| Mixed (2,281 answers) | 25.9% | 39.7% |
| Physically active (838 answers) | 16.9% | 48.9% |
Responses describing physically active work are the least likely of the three groups to report a blood panel: 16.9%, about a third below the 24.9% and 25.9% of the other two. They are also the likeliest of the three to have selected "none of these", at 48.9%.
"None of these" is a box on that list. 53 of the 7,048 responses ticked it alongside one of the five listed activities, and the rates above keep those responses as they were given. The figure records what was selected, not a verified year without care.
Panel uptake more than triples across the income range#
The same question, cut by reported annual income:
View data table
| Annual income | Had a full-body blood panel | Answers |
|---|---|---|
| Under ₹3 lakh | 15.6% | 887 |
| ₹3-6 lakh | 15.7% | 1,997 |
| ₹6-10 lakh | 23.2% | 1,412 |
| ₹10-15 lakh | 27.7% | 963 |
| ₹15-25 lakh | 36.8% | 736 |
| ₹25-40 lakh | 42.8% | 374 |
| ₹40 lakh+ | 54.3% | 138 |
| Prefer not to say | 29.3% | 540 |
Uptake rises at every step up the seven named bands, from 15.6% to 54.3%, though the bottom two sit within 0.2 points of each other rather than a clear rung apart. More than half of the top band reports a panel in the year; fewer than one in six of the bottom band does. The 540 responses that declined to give an income are shown separately, because they are not a point on the ladder. The Income & Job Role page carries this cut in full.
The physically active group sits disproportionately in the lowest of those bands.
Work style and income are separate, unadjusted comparisons. They cannot establish whether income explains the testing gap. The survey records reported activity, not what care was offered, cost or needed.
About a third of desk-based and physically active answers report no 30-minute exercise day#
Three more questions ask about exercise, sleep and stress.
View data table
| Work style | No day with at least 30 minutes of exercise | In one of the two shortest sleep bands | Rated last week's stress 7–10 out of 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sedentary (desk-based, 6+ hrs seated) | 33.4% (4,155) | 32.4% (4,189) | 42.5% (4,073) |
| Mixed (desk + movement, <6 hrs seated) | 25.8% (2,437) | 27.7% (2,455) | 37.1% (2,387) |
| Physically active (e.g., field work, delivery, hospitality) | 33.3% (913) | 31.3% (923) | 40.1% (883) |
Each cell shows the share and the number of responses answering both that question and the work-style question.
On the first measure, the desk-based and physically active groups are almost level. A third of the responses describing physically active work report no day reaching 30 minutes of exercise, 33.3%, and so do 33.4% of the desk-based. Whatever a physically active job supplies over a shift, it does not show up as a smaller share here. The Movement & Exercise page carries the whole-survey distribution behind the question.
The group with the lowest share on that measure is neither pole. Desk work plus movement, under six hours seated, comes in at 25.8%, roughly seven and a half points below both ends. The same group has the lowest share in the two shortest sleep bands, 27.7%, and the lowest share rating last week’s stress at 7–10 out of 10, 37.1%. On all three questions the working day that mixes sitting and moving sits below either one on its own, by modest margins: 4.7 points between the highest and lowest short-sleep share, 5.4 points on stress. The Sleep and Stress pages set out the answer bands and the survey-wide patterns.
One more behaviour separates the groups slightly. Daily smoking of cigarettes or bidis is reported by 9.6% of the 864 physically active responses that answered the nicotine question, against 8.1% of 2,332 mixed and 7.9% of 4,024 desk-based: a spread of 1.7 points, running towards the physically active end rather than away from it. That question is single-choice, so this counts the answers that chose "daily smoker" and not occasional smokers, smokeless tobacco users or vapers. The Nicotine page carries the full answer list.
Zero exercise means no day reaching 30 minutes, not no movement. Short sleep combines the under-five and five-to-six-hour bands. Stress is last week's self-rating. Comparisons do not adjust for age, sex or income.
Dr Maithili Puranik suggests ways to add movement to a desk-based working day, with support from employers.
If you have a desk-based job, set a reminder to take a break every two hours. At least stand up if you have been sitting for a long time. Use the stairs instead of the lift where possible, and take a five- to ten-minute walk after lunch.
HR can also arrange a weekly physical activity session. Some offices already offer yoga or Zumba sessions, which can encourage participation across age groups. At health camps, I make time to speak with HR about the patients I have seen and the support employees need.
Dr Maithili Puranik
Family Physician
Loop Health
References
- 1Holtermann, A., Krause, N., van der Beek, A.J. & Straker, L. The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does. British Journal of Sports Medicine 52, 149–150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097965
- 2World Health Organization. Hypertension (fact sheet, updated 25 September 2025). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension
- 3National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Type 2 Diabetes. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/diabetes/overview/what-is-diabetes/type-2-diabetes
